发新话题
打印

支那匪共國報紙竟然炮轟美國封鎖抗議消息!(二樓附全文)

支那匪共國報紙竟然炮轟美國封鎖抗議消息!(二樓附全文)


來源:博訊


     博讯记者北京报道,一则标题为“US media blackout of protest is shameful” (美国媒体封锁抗议消息可耻)的评论引发了网友的热议,这则出现在头号中共外宣英文媒体《中国日报》上的评论文章,是该报驻纽约的副总编亲自撰写的,文章指责美国主流媒体对发生了两周的华尔街抗议进行封锁,不报道,而且还引伸到美国主流媒体对美国的贫富差距不关心。
   
     华尔街抗议发生两个多星期,包括《纽约时报》在内的主流媒体几乎都有报道,人数最多的那一天,各大电视台也都在头条做了报道,各主流媒体对此的报道平均在三次以上。这个被中国一些媒体人与左派们认定是“美国茉莉花”的抗议运动,对常常有各种抗议的美国来说,也就是一起普通的游行示威,虽然蔓延到多个城市,但在其它城市的规模都非常有限,抗议者反对贪婪的华尔街,指责富人独占财富,影响华盛顿政治决策,要求给青年人更多机会,但除此之外,没有提出更明确的诉求,媒体对于这样的抗议活动,如果没有更深的内容可挖,不可能每天都头版,都去关注。这位《中国日报》的副总编可能看到两个星期中的某一天,有几个媒体没有报道这则抗议新闻,竟然得出了“美国媒体封锁抗议新闻”的结论,并用“可耻”来形容。 .

    《中国日报》是中共最大的一份英文报纸,是用来做外宣,以及供驻华领事馆官员阅读,据调查这份报纸的实际读者群中以中国学习英文的知识分子与大学生为多。西方媒体都是私人的,在报道华尔街抗议时也许有媒体不那么积极,也是有可能的,但说西方主流媒体封锁抗议消息,则是赤裸裸的歪曲与撒谎。
   
    这篇文章在新浪与腾讯微博引起网友嘲笑。有网友指出,中东北非的茉莉花席卷全球,中国三月份开始的“茉莉花运动”卷入十几个城市上千人,此后更有上百人失踪被抓,包括艾未未、滕彪与江天勇,可中国有8千份媒体,六个多月了,竟然没有一份就此事发表过一个字的报道与评论,甚至连批评的评论都不敢登。此事众所周知,没想到,被中国媒体称为“茉莉花”运动在美国上演时,一位《中国日报》的记者竟然来指责美国的媒体“封锁消息”,他显然忘记了,自己来自封锁新闻最严厉的国家,在中国茉莉花期间,外国媒体被禁止采访,而我们这位中国日报驻纽约的记者不但可以到现场随便采访,而且他攻击美国媒体可耻的文章登载在《中国日报》,在美国公开发行。
   
    中共媒体最近经常因为讨主子欢心而丧心病狂,失去了底线,被网友称为最无耻的东西。新浪主管新闻的副总编告诉记者,这位《中国日报》的副编辑是成事不足,败事有余,他的文章旨在洗脑,可实际上却戳破了洗脑的把戏。得不偿失。


[ 本帖最后由 無恥下流 于 2011-10-10 14:29 编辑 ]

TOP

US media blackout of protest is shameful

By Chen Weihua (China Daily)

One of the best-kept secrets in the United States over the past two weeks seems to be the protest on and near Wall Street in New York.

More than 1,000 people protested on the first day, September 17, marching and chanting slogans. Yet the demonstration, known as Occupy Wall Street, did not appear on the major networks' evening news or in major newspapers the next day.

The protest, now in its 14th day, only got limited coverage last Saturday when heavy-handed police arrested close to 100 people and pepper-sprayed several female demonstrators. But most coverage that day was not in-depth.

While there are many videos of harsh police action on the Internet, I have witnessed how the formerly helpful police patrolling the streets have suddenly resorted to force in Zuccotti Park, also known as Liberty Plaza, in Lower Manhattan.

In one scene, several policemen jumped on one skinny man who was not acting violently. They pushed him down and handcuffed him. Just five minutes later, a policeman waved his fist at a man. That day, seven people were arrested, with one suffering a serious leg injury.

Again, none of these incidents made the major networks' evening news or the major newspapers.

As a journalist, I have wondered why the so-called mainstream US media, which is either headquartered in New York or maintains a strong presence in the city, has chosen to ignore the prolonged demonstration since it started. Why have those journalists, who made their names covering various protests around the world, suddenly become silent in reporting the mass rally? That clearly does not match their enthusiasm to cover demonstrations in recent months in places such as North Africa and the Middle East.

The people who come from many parts of the US and the dozens of people who have spent rainy nights in the outdoor plaza would, no doubt, have countless stories to tell. But few journalists from the mainstream media seem interested in listening this time.

To some protesters I have talked to, the answer is simple: It is natural that corporate-controlled media outlets are not going to cover a protest that is fighting excessive corporate influence in society.

One US journalist said it was because these people are too left-leaning and do not seem to have a clear goal for their rally. I am not sure if they are all left-leaning, but a schedule I saw did include sessions on the Communist Manifesto and Spanish Revolution.

Still, that does not justify a blackout imposed by the major news media outlets on such a prolonged protest.

In fact, the message from the protesters is quite clear. They are against corporate greed and influence in American politics, economy and life. These protesters, who call themselves "The 99 Percent", are angry about the huge amount of wealth collected by the top 1 percent of the population.

Vanity Fair has reported that the top 1 percent of the nation controlled 12 percent of US wealth only 25 years ago, while today it controls close to 25 percent.

Isn't that a serious concern for journalists, whose primary responsibility is to speak for the voiceless in their society?

It is a shame that most so-called mainstream media outlets have miserably failed to inform the public over the past two weeks.

The author, based in New York, is deputy editor of China Daily USA. E-mail: [email protected]

TOP

发新话题